This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (665) eHealth Literacy / Digital Literacy (460) Tools and Questionnaires in Human Factors Evaluation (63)

Published on in Vol 24, No 3 (2022): March

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/32777, first published .
Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting

Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting

Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting

Authors of this article:

Christina Cheng1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Gerald R Elsworth1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Richard H Osborne1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (13) Tweetations (9) Metrics

Christina Cheng   1, 2 * , PhD ;   Gerald R Elsworth   1, 2 * , PhD ;   Richard H Osborne   1, 2 * , PhD

1 School of Health Sciences, Centre for Global Health and Equity, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia

2 Faculty of Health, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia

*all authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

  • Christina Cheng, PhD
  • School of Health Sciences
  • Centre for Global Health and Equity
  • Swinburne University of Technology
  • Room 907, Level 9, AMCD Building
  • 453/469-477 Burwood Road
  • Hawthorn, 3122
  • Australia
  • Phone: 61 392145470
  • Email: [email protected]
OSZAR »